Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat

Too bad it was a complete lie. I used Macs extensively from '87 through the '90s. My wife had one she bought in '95 or so, so we had direct comparisons between our PCs and her Macs. 95 wasn't the greatest OS ever written, but it did real work much better than any Mac OS I ever used prior to OSX. Try multi-tasking. Heck, just try running multiple programs on a mid-90s era Performa and see what happens. It took no effort at all for me to crash my wife's machine, which became a problem when one of mine was down and I needed online.

The Mac may or may not be a great platform, but mac lunatics have seriously hurt their own cause by making idiotic statements like the one I referenced.


110 posted on 03/08/2005 2:55:10 PM PST by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: 1L
Try multi-tasking. Heck, just try running multiple programs on a mid-90s era Performa and see what happens.

The Win 95 = Mac 88 is about the user interface. I've already well-trashed pre-OS X cooperative multitasking and lack of memory protection, which was the reason for the stability problems.

112 posted on 03/08/2005 2:58:58 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson