[DJ MacWoW]

It is very simple, unless you are consciously choosing to ignore it

As I said before, you won't believe what ANY doctor.

If he bases his disagreement on a different interpretation of the same scan, he isn't saying so.

Didn't listen to his interview in the provided link, did ya. It's in post #55. And he spent a combined time of 10 hours with Terri. The first time for 5 hours. But he has to be a quack because the euthanasia experts spent a LOT less time and they're more knowledgeable, right? You do realise that the 3 who said she's PVS regularly testify for euthanasia? No axe to grind there.

[lugsoul]

Terri's representative said that the three who testified in court presented scientific findings, while the other two presented anecdotal findings, despite the Court practically begging them for scientific support for their conclusions. Based upon your posts above, I suspect what we are hearing now is more of the same - conclusions from anecdotal evidence uncorroborated by scientific fact.

No, I haven't listened to the 90 minute interview barely posted 90 minutes ago just yet. Care to give me your interpretation of what Hammesfahr says about the CT and why everyone else got it wrong?