And your evidence to support that claim would be ..????
If I need to provide you evidence that the Enron situation is more complicated than a guy stealing classified documents, this isn't going to be a very fruitful discussion.
You're not in a position to take that superior tone since your argument is the weak one here.
Stealing money .. stealing documents - and .. Berger was visiting the National Archives several times over the years, and I bet they're trying to establish just how much stuff he may have taken .. I dare say an "instant" resolution to what Berger did just doesn't seem probable to me.
And .. if you're not willing to defend your statements - then maybe it's better not to say them. To just make wild claims that the govt isn't doing this or that - demands evidence to support it - no evidence .. sorry!
And I love the comeback - insinuating that I'm the reason the discussion won't be fruitful - when you're the person making the claim ..??