Skip to comments.
Security missing when it comes to justice system's greatest assest
Daily Herald ^
| March 7, 2005
| Chuck Goudie
Posted on 03/07/2005 3:07:37 PM PST by LauraJean
Goudie wants to know why Federal judges aren't getting home security with a ''panic button'' to summon police and U.S. Marshalls to their homes.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailyherald.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: lefkow; securitysystems
My own thoughts are why should the taxpayers have to pay to put security systems into the homes of judges when they have the finacial withal to install them for themselves.
1
posted on
03/07/2005 3:07:40 PM PST
by
LauraJean
To: LauraJean
RKV want's to know why judges just don't buy a shotgun like the rest of us plebes.
2
posted on
03/07/2005 3:11:49 PM PST
by
RKV
( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
To: LauraJean
Maybe because of that inconvenient "equal protection of the law" thing.
3
posted on
03/07/2005 3:15:56 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
(Gleefully watching the self-demolition of all things left-wing)
To: LauraJean
Great! Why don't we install special things for judges, EVERY Federal, State and Local Official, Jurors in controversial cases, Bloggers in general and on and on. Don't think so.
Another solution from someone who thinks there is no cost to 'Security' and that public coffers are limitless. IMO He should work for the TSA.
4
posted on
03/07/2005 3:18:12 PM PST
by
drt1
To: LauraJean

Chuck Goudie
5
posted on
03/07/2005 3:25:31 PM PST
by
kcvl
To: LauraJean
Maybe we should pass a Constitutional Amendment saying that everyone can arm themselves. That way these judges, and the rest of us, could protect ourselves, our families, and our homes.
6
posted on
03/07/2005 3:55:37 PM PST
by
gitmo
(Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
To: gitmo
Right on. It's about time citizens learn the best protection is the right to protect themselves.
7
posted on
03/07/2005 4:04:42 PM PST
by
Logical me
(Oh, well!!!)
To: thoughtomator
Would that it were so. The police are under no specific obligation to protect you individually, btw. So you can't sue them if they don't do their jobs. Most officers do their darndest in a tough situation IMHO, but it would be much better if the judges of this country had to make do JUST LIKE THE REST OF US and no special privileges for them. Then maybe they would have a better understanding of what the 2nd Amendment means.
8
posted on
03/07/2005 4:12:23 PM PST
by
RKV
( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
To: kcvl
Jeez, either that's been Photoshopped or this guy has had a Bruce Jenner-level facelift.
9
posted on
03/07/2005 4:13:18 PM PST
by
Xenalyte
("Marsa Stert is a britch and I sit on the exhange.")
To: Xenalyte
I don't think it's Photoshopped. What's a Bruce Jenner-level face lift? lol!
10
posted on
03/07/2005 4:43:34 PM PST
by
kcvl
To: LauraJean
I detect a singular lack of respect for our lords and masters. For Shame!
11
posted on
03/07/2005 4:54:34 PM PST
by
McGarrett
(Book'em Danno)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson