[jackbob]

Well there you go again. I see that your first three comments that you are still making up conclusionary statements with no supporting analysis, in total disregard for the evidence at hand. I more than substantially explained and presented evidence of the Libertarian Party context in the first six paragraphs of my reply #88. Your brushing past all that, with unsupported denials and childish insults, is quite sophomoric.

Now you propose that "the real subject here has become" my "libertarian bashing mania." Of course I have nothing against a new subject being brought in, especially since you so totally defaulted on the last one. The only problem here is that you bring in a new subject with a false claim about me, but no supporting evidence, no analysis, no argument, and not even an explanation. It really sounds just like another one of your unsupported childish statement with no evidence to back it up.

I find that when someone has something substantial to say, they do not rely on insults to make their point. They may use counter insults, but they never initiate them. But what has surprised me is how you initiated insults, and then cry foul when you get it thrown back in your face.

[P_A_I]

jackbob wrote:

I more than substantially explained and presented evidence of the Libertarian Party context in the first six paragraphs of my reply #88.

And I've been countering your slurs on [small 'l'] american libertarians since our dialog on this thread started.
As I've noted, you seem obsessed with hatred for libertarianism to the point that you falsely claim to be one in order to misrepresent libertarian views on the US Constitution.

Feel free to continue your little 'crusade', as I will continue to expose it as libertarian bashing mania.