Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: Dan from Michigan
35 posted on
03/07/2005 10:54:17 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(Proudly Posting Without Reading the Article Since 1999!)
To: Dan from Michigan
I propose that Amnesty International and the UN give up their guns first in a sign of good faith.
To: Dan from Michigan
So guns may be a mans thing, but we do not get bent out of shape on how many hair dryers the ladies have and or ice picks.
39 posted on
03/07/2005 11:03:25 AM PST by
Ibredd
To: Dan from Michigan; basil; dbwz
U.S. studies have shown that having a gun in the house increases the risk that someone in the house will be murdered by 41 percent, but boosts the risk for women by 272 percent. What absolute liberal BS. these figures have been refuted over and over again!
41 posted on
03/07/2005 11:05:46 AM PST by
2nd amendment mama
( www.2asisters.org • Self defense is a basic human right!)
To: Dan from Michigan
Only the police should have guns. Since America is acting as the World's Police, because no other country has the moral will and courage to do the job, only Americans should have guns.
Works for me.
44 posted on
03/07/2005 11:20:18 AM PST by
trebb
("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
To: Dan from Michigan
"The activists noted there were an estimated 650 million guns in circulation around the world -- almost all in the hands of men.."
And their point is????????????
45 posted on
03/07/2005 11:21:43 AM PST by
roaddog727
(The marginal propensity to save is 1 minus the marginal propensity to consume.)
To: Dan from Michigan
"We want tough action." The term "tough" does not conjure up images of blue helmets shouting "Stop! or we'll say 'Stop' again!"
How do they intend to be "tough" with well-armed non-cooperators?
To: Dan from Michigan; AnnaZ
I think their message is for woment to arm themselves. That would be much easier than getting trid of all guns.
FREE GUNS FOR FEMALES!!!
48 posted on
03/07/2005 11:39:58 AM PST by
Feiny
( The knack of flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.)
To: Dan from Michigan
51 posted on
03/07/2005 11:43:22 AM PST by
ibbryn
(this tag intentionally left blank)
To: Dan from Michigan
Hey Dipshits, I tell ya what. You can have all my ammo. C'mon over anytime and I'll LET YA HAVE IT!
61 posted on
03/07/2005 1:03:09 PM PST by
MAWG
(Diversity is where everyone looks different but thinks the same way.)
To: Dan from Michigan
"Given that they are almost never the buyers, owners or users of small arms, (women) suffer disproportionately from armed violence," I see they've never met Mrs. Lurker.
L
70 posted on
03/07/2005 2:39:44 PM PST by
Lurker
(Remember the Beirut Bombing. 243 dead Marines. The House of Assad and Hezbollah did it..)
To: Dan from Michigan
"Where guns are available, more women are likely to be killed," Searle said. Not true. While more women are likely to be killed with guns, fewer women overall are killed or injured by violent criminals when there are more guns in the population. The mere possibility of a victim that can use deadly force to protect herself is enough to dissuade many violent criminals from their planned acts.
73 posted on
03/07/2005 3:26:17 PM PST by
Redcloak
(More cleverly arranged 1's and 0's)
To: Dan from Michigan
There's really no point in arguing with them. At some point, we'll just have to kill 'em all. If we don't...
74 posted on
03/07/2005 3:40:53 PM PST by
Noumenon
(The Left's dedication to the destruction of a free society makes them unfit to live in that society.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
