Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

B-2 bombers headed to Guam (first time ever)
Stars and Stripes ^ | March 1

Posted on 03/07/2005 6:47:24 AM PST by Truth666

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: mylife; Fitzcarraldo

BTTT


21 posted on 03/07/2005 7:05:03 AM PST by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cynicom

Got to be TDY. AF pukes will find a way to get per diem out of this, even if they have to sit on the beach to do it. Also, Rep Ike Skelton would never let his babies get out of the nest for good.


22 posted on 03/07/2005 7:05:42 AM PST by VaFederalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Truth666

B-2s have definitely deployed to Guam before (see this article from 1998: http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/bomber/n19980317_980365.html ).

Maybe this is referring to the new deployment being more of a permanent, forward-deployed det.


23 posted on 03/07/2005 7:08:04 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaFederalist

I have no knowledge of current requirements of forward deployment but in the distant past we were on "duty" 24/7 for 90 days at a time. (drunk or sober) Per diem bought extra booze.


24 posted on 03/07/2005 7:22:21 AM PST by cynicom (<p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Truth666
LINK 01/13/2004

Begert mentioned basing a fighter wing on Guam as well as air refueling aircraft, the new unmanned Global Hawk spy plane, and long-range bombers like the B-2 stealth bomber, for which special air-conditioned hangars were positioned there last year before the start of the Iraq war.

These are "very attractive kinds of options that in today's world, with the importance of Asia in this century, all make good sense," he said. Begert noted that last spring the Air Force deployed B-1 and B-52 long-range bombers to Guam temporarily.

B-1
B-52
B-2

BINGO!

25 posted on 03/07/2005 7:27:24 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Thanks for the ping!


26 posted on 03/07/2005 7:28:50 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Probably North Korea. We are sending them a message.

China is a future problem if they go for Taiwan. The problem with a Guam deployment is the Red Chinese have missile subs that could do a first strike on Guam and then we've lost half our B-2 strength.


27 posted on 03/07/2005 7:33:43 AM PST by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Truth666
The release did not specify the number of B-2s deploying to Guam.

The USAF isn't going to go through the effort and cost of upgrading multiple non-CONUS airfields to support the B-2. The airfield at Diego Garcia is in the Indian Ocean and approximately 3200 miles / 5200km away from targets in Iran. This also puts bombers with a replacment value of more than $1B USD each within Iranian missile range. One other problem with Diego Garcia is that it is owned by Britain and We need their permission to operate from there. Some day the US and UK may have a difference of opinion regarding the WOT and that will affect our access to Diego Garcia.

Guam is approximately 6k miles away (great circle) from most targets in Iran, outside of their missile range and most importantly a US protectorate. That gives our President and military leaders the most flexibility to operate - unilaterily if required.


28 posted on 03/07/2005 7:34:25 AM PST by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
Not the "First Time Ever". I remember (growing up on SAC bases) friends tranferibg there and wings doing temp duty there in the 60s and 70s.

Not first time for SAC (which doesn't exist any longer) or for strategic bombers, first time for the B-2.

29 posted on 03/07/2005 7:40:11 AM PST by El Gato (Activist Judges can twist the Constitution into anything they want ... or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RicocheT
The problem with a Guam deployment is the Red Chinese have missile subs that could do a first strike on Guam

The Navy's attack subs trailing the ChiCom boomers would sink the ChiCom missile boats boats before they could launch. Depending on the ROA of course.

30 posted on 03/07/2005 7:44:38 AM PST by El Gato (Activist Judges can twist the Constitution into anything they want ... or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RicocheT

If China does attack Taiwan, it will go nuclear pretty quick. My thought is that putting the B-52s on Guam is more of a symbolic threat than a real one to China.

It might also be intended to ease the fears of the Japanese, who seem to be preparing for war, of late.


31 posted on 03/07/2005 7:45:11 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; Non-Sequitur

Thanks. There are two places to find any information you need: Google and Free Republic.


32 posted on 03/07/2005 7:46:38 AM PST by BJClinton (What's the difference between the Super Bowl and the Grammy's? The Eagles have won a Grammy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

ohhh, dear.


33 posted on 03/07/2005 7:47:07 AM PST by nw_arizona_granny (The enemy within, will be found in the "Communist Manifesto 1963", you are living it today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn; Cindy; jriemer




http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1357652/posts?page=28#28


34 posted on 03/07/2005 7:48:48 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BJClinton

Bump

Bump

:)


35 posted on 03/07/2005 7:49:24 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: WestCoastGal; DAVEY CROCKETT; appalachian_dweller; TexasCowboy; jerseygirl; SevenofNine; lacylu; ...

Interesting article and good photos.


36 posted on 03/07/2005 7:59:20 AM PST by nw_arizona_granny (The enemy within, will be found in the "Communist Manifesto 1963", you are living it today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Thanks!


37 posted on 03/07/2005 8:02:10 AM PST by windchime (Hillary: "I've always been a preying person")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Truth666
Anderson Air Force base

Click the photo for a larger image

38 posted on 03/07/2005 8:05:54 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Thanks for the picture; it brings back memories.

One thing you don't get from this picture is a sense of how uneven Anderson is. There's a humongous dip in the runway that caused the somewhat underpowered B52Ds to actually lose airspeed as they climbed out of it on their takeoff rolls. D model takeoffs at Anderson were always a little dicey.

I recall being out on the parking ramp at the near end of the left runway one day and seeing a D model go screaming by still firmly on the ground, use the entire length of the overrun and pop up only to disappear over the edge of the cliff.

A few minutes later it reappeared in the distance, gamely struggling to climb back to the level of the field. That cliff was 500 feet of instant altitude and it saved more than a few lives.

39 posted on 03/07/2005 8:32:20 AM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe; Valin; SAMWolf

ping


40 posted on 03/07/2005 8:33:59 AM PST by Professional Engineer (And the winner is............Bitty Girl by a pigtail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson