Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cold Heat
I just thought the reference inaccurate and misleading.

As was the entire article. The Asian Earthquake happened before he Starquake's energy burst arrived.

117 posted on 03/07/2005 11:02:24 AM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2

correction: "before THE ...."


118 posted on 03/07/2005 11:03:25 AM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: UCANSEE2
The Asian Earthquake happened before he Starquake's energy burst arrived.

Not saying the article is correct, but the radiation emitted is what was reported on that day, that is the what we could measure.

The event would have occurred 50,000 years ago.

One could theorize that something not measured by our sats could have come before the radiation. Kinda like the pressure wave before the light of the explosion and not after,as is the case with the speed of sound in air.

The closeness of the two events is all that is needed for speculation.

Which was the question raised by the article. And speculation is all it is. But interesting, none the less.

119 posted on 03/07/2005 11:14:55 AM PST by Cold Heat (This space is being paid not to do anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: UCANSEE2
Something else worth mentioning, and I do not see this info attached to the debate.

In order to say the earthquake occurred before the radiation arrived, we have to be on exactly the same time stamp. A few hours of difference, and even a day difference is not unusual when mixing GMT and various local time stamps.

So who knows......

121 posted on 03/07/2005 11:27:21 AM PST by Cold Heat (This space is being paid not to do anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson