Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JeanS
Just look at that photo. George H.W. Bush does not look 80.
Bill Clinton does not look 58.

George H.W. Bush looks about 65 so does Bill Clinton.

11 posted on 03/06/2005 4:09:28 PM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Common Tator
"George H.W. Bush looks about 65 so does Bill Clinton."

When they first started their tsunami thing they did a big press conference, and I couldn't take my eyes off them. At first it doesn't hit you, because they're both ex-presidents, and you expect an ex-pres to look, well, aged. But then it just came over my that they look the same age, but Clinton is actually the SAME AGE as W.

At the time, I said that they both looked 70.

To look at it another way, they're a generation apart. One could theorize that Bush41's "clean living" bought him half a generation in slowed aging. Clinton's "sex-drugs-rockandroll" living COST him half a generation, and accelerated his.

41 posted on 03/06/2005 4:36:39 PM PST by oprahstheantichrist (Terri's battle is NOT against flesh and blood....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson