Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rossi team issues list of "felon" voters - (Wa. State Gov. Gregoire far from a "done deal")
SEATTLE TIMES.COM ^ | MARCH 4, 2005 | STAFF

Posted on 03/05/2005 10:21:12 PM PST by CHARLITE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: RHOACO

Forwarded this to my cousin. Thanks.




21 posted on 03/06/2005 8:03:36 AM PST by planekT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RHOACO

Interesting stuff. I'd heard most of it except about the illegitimate son (and I lived in DC at the time, tho I was a high schooler in '68 when Johnson was prez and not paying much attention to anything but the war). I wonder if he'd be able to keep that kind of thing covered up these days?


22 posted on 03/06/2005 12:12:55 PM PST by radiohead (revote in washington state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: radiohead; RHOACO
I saw the woman who had LBJ's son on a daytime network TV talk show sometime in the mid to late 1970's. I can no longer recall who was hosting the show. However, the woman said that she received a phone call from Lyndon on Nov. 21, 1963 from Ft. Worth, where they had stopped for an event featuring President Kennedy, before the flight to Dallas on Nov. 22nd.

She went on to say that LBJ told her, "After tomorrow, no Kennedy is going to make a fool out of me ever again."

The son that she had by LBJ was on the TV show with her, and his resemblance to Johnson was startling. He was like a clone!

I kept looking for more appearances by Johnson's mistress, but I never saw her again, and apparently "someone" got to her rather quickly after that national TV appearance, because she was silent thereafter. She fell off the radar, and to my knowledge, never made any other public appearances.

I wonder if she is still alive, or if she committed to paper the facts, as she knew them, about LBJ's prior knowledge of the assassination of JFK.

23 posted on 03/06/2005 1:06:02 PM PST by CHARLITE (Women are powerful; freedom is beautiful.........and STUPID IS FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

It is unfortunate, but this situation--as well as illegal immigration--helps make the case for a national ID card, and a huge effort to computerize all criminal, civil and military records.

We are currently at a point where we cannot trust our elections because the data we are using is flawed.

We need good data.


24 posted on 03/06/2005 1:13:35 PM PST by Erik Latranyi (9-11 is your Peace Dividend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

A few questions that I have not seen answered.

1) Is this comprehensive?
2) In the county ? In the State?
3) What percentage went for the dem? (I bet 80+)
4) Will the pubbies follow through?

Time will tell.


25 posted on 03/06/2005 2:04:38 PM PST by lawdude (Liberalism is a mental disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deetes
I would have thought there fraud would be much ,much more.

Of course there was 'much, much more' This is just the tip of an iceberg, as in most crooked elections. The real story isn't what happens on Election Day. Any democrat poll worker will tell you that as long as you don't make the mistake of voting your your fraudulents twice, you're fairly safe from detection.

Notice also that this particular set of 1,000 fraudulent voters have at least some connection to reality. I.E., they were once alive,are felons, or real folks who voted at least twice (a hallowed democrat tradition). But, there are also significant numbers (usually just enough) of entirely fictitious voters (The Loretta Sanchez Effect), which having been voted once by absentee ballot, are virtually undetectable without massive investigation. I will bet right now that there are probably a good 5,000 complete "virtual voters" on the rolls.

This is going on in EVERY "Urban" area of the country. What the Rossi Team is actually doing is providing the democrats with the parameters they need to refine their techniques for the next scam.

Why not, instead of a re-election with the same cast of democrat characters now working a little slicker, take this opportunity to really check the voter rolls of the state?

26 posted on 03/07/2005 5:17:39 AM PST by Kenny Bunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson