Posted on 03/05/2005 10:21:12 PM PST by CHARLITE
Forwarded this to my cousin. Thanks.
Interesting stuff. I'd heard most of it except about the illegitimate son (and I lived in DC at the time, tho I was a high schooler in '68 when Johnson was prez and not paying much attention to anything but the war). I wonder if he'd be able to keep that kind of thing covered up these days?
She went on to say that LBJ told her, "After tomorrow, no Kennedy is going to make a fool out of me ever again."
The son that she had by LBJ was on the TV show with her, and his resemblance to Johnson was startling. He was like a clone!
I kept looking for more appearances by Johnson's mistress, but I never saw her again, and apparently "someone" got to her rather quickly after that national TV appearance, because she was silent thereafter. She fell off the radar, and to my knowledge, never made any other public appearances.
I wonder if she is still alive, or if she committed to paper the facts, as she knew them, about LBJ's prior knowledge of the assassination of JFK.
It is unfortunate, but this situation--as well as illegal immigration--helps make the case for a national ID card, and a huge effort to computerize all criminal, civil and military records.
We are currently at a point where we cannot trust our elections because the data we are using is flawed.
We need good data.
A few questions that I have not seen answered.
1) Is this comprehensive?
2) In the county ? In the State?
3) What percentage went for the dem? (I bet 80+)
4) Will the pubbies follow through?
Time will tell.
Of course there was 'much, much more' This is just the tip of an iceberg, as in most crooked elections. The real story isn't what happens on Election Day. Any democrat poll worker will tell you that as long as you don't make the mistake of voting your your fraudulents twice, you're fairly safe from detection.
Notice also that this particular set of 1,000 fraudulent voters have at least some connection to reality. I.E., they were once alive,are felons, or real folks who voted at least twice (a hallowed democrat tradition). But, there are also significant numbers (usually just enough) of entirely fictitious voters (The Loretta Sanchez Effect), which having been voted once by absentee ballot, are virtually undetectable without massive investigation. I will bet right now that there are probably a good 5,000 complete "virtual voters" on the rolls.
This is going on in EVERY "Urban" area of the country. What the Rossi Team is actually doing is providing the democrats with the parameters they need to refine their techniques for the next scam.
Why not, instead of a re-election with the same cast of democrat characters now working a little slicker, take this opportunity to really check the voter rolls of the state?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.