"There was NO evidence, simply unsupported, and in many cases anonymous, statements by those who had an obvious bias in the case.
In many threads it appeared that a lynch-mob mentality had taken over, using terrorist style posters and slogans to excite the masses while abandoning reason"
___________________________________________
Not true. Armanious and his family were threatened with death in an internet chat room called Pal-Talk. The poster said they would be killed like chickens.
Face it, that kind of hateful spew is the lynch mob mentality. I would call threatening to kill someone's family like chickens because you don't like what they say about your religion to be abandoning reason.
You've got the right adjectives, but they apply equally to the islamic creeps who threatened Armanious. Without the hate in the form of death threats from someone (or more than one) in the islamic community for this family there would have been no reason to think it was a hate crime.
That's where it started. Own it.
"Not true. Armanious and his family were threatened with death in an internet chat room called Pal-Talk. The poster said they would be killed like chickens."
Try to take anonymous chat-room statements to court as "evidence" ...
"Face it, that kind of hateful spew is the lynch mob mentality. I would call threatening to kill someone's family like chickens because you don't like what they say about your religion to be abandoning reason."
Yep, I totally agree, and would fight it there also, even more then I do here.
"You've got the right adjectives, but they apply equally to the islamic creeps who threatened Armanious."
EXACTLY - It dosen't belong there or here...
We are in absolute, total agreement on this point.