Where does the report say that "one of them" was using the card??>.>
I just flipped thru 5 local news channels.
Apparently there is video of the alledged killers as they used the ATM card in a drive thru ATM.
Seems very damning.
This was apparently a robbery gone wrong.
They meant to rob, not kill the family.
The youngest daughter broke free at one point and saw one the killers, so then then proceeded to kill the whole family so they couldnt be identified.
"This was apparently a robbery gone wrong."
Hubby made a good point to me tonight, maybe the killer was trying to make it look like an Islamofacist murder, he certainly would have known they were Christians, not Muslims, and he might have known about their proslyetizing. This would explain why it "sorta, kinda" looked like a religiously motivated crime, and yet was not "exactly" right.
The youngest daughter broke free at one point and saw one the killers, so then then proceeded to kill the whole family so they couldnt be identified.
The killings are too calculated for them to be "unplanned"; they could have just killed the daughter, too.
If she "broke free" why did they tie her up again and "puncture" her throat, these guys are "throat slitters" if anything, or, they could have beaten them to death, they were "helpless".
Then they took the time to wipe the scene clean of fingerprints?
They were a part of it, they facilitated the entry of the killers and were paid with the card.