Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thoughtomator

In the case of those who do not have the capability, charities work fine.

But what about the greedy? The jealous? The vain? The indolent? Those who do not possess moral fiber?


167 posted on 03/04/2005 10:14:51 AM PST by Al Gator (God did not give us life so that we could run and ask a bureaucrat what to do with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: Al Gator

What about them? Why can't they just be ignored?

Some people are simply worthless human beings, and no social order or legal order can change that. There will always be dregs in any society... as you say, that's human nature. If they commit a crime, they can be punished for it. If not, let them act as they will. If someone is greedy, others will be less likely to deal with them. If someone is vain, others will be less interested in socializing with them. To each the result of his own actions. That's fair, consistent, and workable.


172 posted on 03/04/2005 10:20:22 AM PST by thoughtomator (National Socialist, Transnational Socialist, what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

To: Al Gator

No moral fiber?

Eat rye bread


191 posted on 03/04/2005 10:52:02 AM PST by trubluolyguy ("You think that's tough, try losing a testicle in a knife fight with your mother")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson