I might be able to see the difference if anyone were able to provide a rationale for it. Given the number of times I have asked for one, and the total absence of an explanation, Ockham's Razor leads me to believe that there isn't any.
Really, what's to stop a libertarian society from existing in the absence of a stifling social order? Why are not the values expressed in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution not sufficient? Or do you consider those values to constitute a stifling social order?
Maybe I not understanding what you want.
A rational?
Do we start with why humans socialized in the first place and then move forward through time and history? Or can we assume a starting point somewhere along the way?
The values of the constitution are indeed sufficient if everyone agrees to honor them.
Trouble is, not everyone is created equal.
Libertarians tend to think that everyone else is as self sufficient as you.
That is not true. And therein lies the beginning of the end of minimalist government.