What I'm saying, and said already, is that is supposed to be the norm. But that in these cases people legitimately complain, based on the wording of the majority opinion itself, that the Court is NOT using the Constitution as the norm. Thus these, in that real way, are NOT Constitutionally-based decisions. They SHOULD be. And there should be consequences for the Court if they are not. The Legislative branch may well have a role to play. We'll see.
But that in these cases people legitimately complain, based on the wording of the majority opinion itself, that the Court is NOT using the Constitution as the norm.
People can complain all they want. If the COURT says it it unconstitutional or constitutional the people have no claim. Sad but true.