it is because of her, and people like her that regular folk so often lose their butts in the market.
It is not their personal playground and private bank.
She violated trust. She attempted to tamper with evidence by changing computer records. She lied to the fed.
When they got close she reversed the record tampering, but was left with the BS. They nailed with it.
She was also guilty, but not prosecuted for insider trading. The amounts were just not enough to get attention, but some investor we don't know paid for that, and it was not her.
These types of white collar crimes usually go undetected and under prosecuted, but I am glad they made a example of her.
What the should have done was thrown the book at the CEO.
She was in essence charged with being dishonest under oath. How is it irrelevant that the people accusing her did the same thing they accused he of? Only a Clintonite could make that argument.