Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wristpin; nicko; Archangelsk

What I meant was if the manditory retirement age is at 65 and they accept up to age 45, a person could retire in 20 years at age 65, and have a pension. I know quite a few "geezers" (over age 35) who could run circles around most 18 year olds.


34 posted on 03/03/2005 11:24:48 AM PST by RasterMaster (Saddam's family were WMD's - He's behind bars & his sons are DEAD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: RasterMaster
I think I see your point. The active-duty Army requires almost everyone to reach 20 years of service by age 55, so that's how they arrive at a minimum age of 35. There are a few loopholes for people who will reach 20 years of service by age 60. I don't think anyone is talking about loosening any of these rules.
38 posted on 03/03/2005 11:28:48 AM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: RasterMaster
Many states have their own military organizations that can accept non-prior-service recruits beyond the age for federal military service (e.g. up to age 50 or more).

These state organizations vary widely in quality and mission. For about 9 years, I got to serve in the state defense force that is probably the best in the country, by far, the Indiana Guard Reserve (IGR).

To see if your state has a organization (or to see if there's one in a nearby state) just click here for the State Guard Association.

39 posted on 03/03/2005 11:35:46 AM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: RasterMaster

The reason why I got out in 2002 after 22 years in service was because I could no longer keep up with guys half my age. I was, therefore, a liability to the unit. The true test of a warrior is to know when he must turn the reins over to the next generation. Anything else is just ego and misplaced testosterone talking.


42 posted on 03/03/2005 11:40:19 AM PST by Archangelsk (There is nothing more cowardly than a keyboard warrior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: RasterMaster

got it- I see where you're coming from...depending on your rank, etc...you can stay in a long time...I could have done 30 years of warrant officer service had I wanted to, which would have put me out right around 63 years old- the problem is, when you stretch into that middle 40's mark, you're really starting to slow down; you've already put in a couple of decades of wear and tear on your body- I could run a sub 12 minute two mile when I was 32, and even though I still work out everyday, I can't come close to that now...when I got to where I couldn't push the 18 year olds, I knew it was time to go...but that's just me...


47 posted on 03/03/2005 11:49:27 AM PST by nicko (CW3 (ret.) CPT, you need to just unass the AO; I know what I'm doing- that goes for you too, Major)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson