Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cableguy

15-40%? that's a heck of a margin for error?


5 posted on 03/03/2005 9:37:59 AM PST by smonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: smonk

I think they were representative samplings taken at different times, not a range for one sample.


6 posted on 03/03/2005 9:39:22 AM PST by henkster (When democrats talk of "the rich," they are referring to anyone with a private sector job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: smonk

I think those are numbers from different stations, 15% being the low, 40% the high. It's a range of data, not margin of error.


7 posted on 03/03/2005 9:39:31 AM PST by thoughtomator (Not available in stores - for a limited time only)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: smonk

Never mind that... range for different shows, I gather, not different stations.


8 posted on 03/03/2005 9:40:22 AM PST by thoughtomator (Not available in stores - for a limited time only)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: smonk

I suspect that across most of the south...the numbers since November have been dismal for CBS news. I think the company probably avoids regional analysis...because it just stirs the pot even more against Dan. He was a lousy reporter...and should have left over 20 years ago. CBS simply never believed the numbers.


9 posted on 03/03/2005 9:40:35 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson