Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tfecw
Since when are chemical agents considered a WMD?

That's right. The nukes are orders of magnitude more awesomely destructive. It's a different category.

51 posted on 03/03/2005 9:54:20 AM PST by RightWhale (Please correct if cosmic balance requires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale
whoops that should have been Not considered a WMD. I'll give you a canister of gas isn't a WMD, but bombs and scuds could be considered a WMD. It was an attempt to be sarcastic and point out how the MSM changes the definition every week or so depending on what we come across in Iraq.

If they meant Nuke to be the only WMD then they should just say Nukes, not WMD.
56 posted on 03/03/2005 9:58:09 AM PST by tfecw (Vote Democrat, It's easier then working)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson