Call your Congressmen! Support House Resolution 97. which would prohibit the Supreme Court from relying on foreign/international law or "opinion." This is VERY IMPORTANT, especially in light of this week's Supreme Court decision!!
Initially introduced by Representative Tom Freeney (R) of Florida last year, the bill was reintroduced in February. Contact your Congressmen to express your support for this bill and urge them to co-sponsor it!!
Mr. Freeney's DC office number is (202) 225-2706.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: totherightofu
To: totherightofu
Can it be made retroactive?
4 posted on
03/03/2005 6:29:30 AM PST by
SpyGuy
(Liberalism is slow societal suicide. And screw political correctness: Islam is the Religion of Death)
To: totherightofu
Great post. Thanks. Bump!
5 posted on
03/03/2005 6:29:35 AM PST by
PGalt
To: totherightofu
it's just very sad that we actually need a Congressional resolution to tell the SCOTUS that the Constitution, not international opinion, is the basis for our laws.
6 posted on
03/03/2005 6:31:43 AM PST by
frankiep
To: totherightofu
I think this would have to be a Constitutional amendment not to infringe on the separation of powers. Congress can't tell the Court how to do its job, only the Constitution can.
7 posted on
03/03/2005 6:31:44 AM PST by
Grut
To: totherightofu
its Rep Tom FEENEY...he was the Speaker of the Florida House before being elected to congress/
8 posted on
03/03/2005 6:31:53 AM PST by
kingattax
To: totherightofu
unless such foreign judgments, laws, or pronouncements inform an understanding of the original meaning of the Constitution of the United States. I say "kill all the lawyers" first. Otherwise we will continue to get crap like this. What does it mean?
10 posted on
03/03/2005 6:33:15 AM PST by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
To: totherightofu
Done! I also e-mailed my Rep here in northern Illinois.
12 posted on
03/03/2005 6:39:04 AM PST by
Grendel9
To: totherightofu
This "sense of the house" amounts to an opinion and is not binding. It does nothing. They should be drafting articles of impeachment. That would actually accomplish something.
16 posted on
03/03/2005 6:43:53 AM PST by
MileHi
To: totherightofu
Heard Feeney on with Mark Levin last night...it was a mutual admiration society...
18 posted on
03/03/2005 6:45:15 AM PST by
pookie18
(Clinton Happens!)
To: totherightofu
Bumping again! Tom Feeney is a great American doing the work of the American people. He took an oath and is standing up for it. Checks & balances bump!
20 posted on
03/03/2005 6:49:10 AM PST by
PGalt
To: totherightofu
Call your Congressmen! Support House Resolution 97. which would prohibit the Supreme Court from relying on foreign/international law or "opinion."
Where does this resolution 'prohibit' the Supreme Court from relying on foreign/international law?... It is only a resolution expressing the sense of the House and isn't binding on the Court.
If they want to bind the legislation, etc then they need to explicitly state so in the legislation they enact.
21 posted on
03/03/2005 6:51:31 AM PST by
deport
(You know you are getting older when everything either dries up or leaks.)
To: totherightofu
If this bill became law would it invalidate past rulings by SCOTUS or any other court that cited foreign law or opinion?
22 posted on
03/03/2005 6:55:21 AM PST by
FarmerW
To: totherightofu
This is a fine sentiment but it's purely for show. It's toothless. It has no force of law.
To: totherightofu
Expressing the sense of the House of RepresentativesNo, No, NO!!!
The appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Cout is subject to such regulations as Congress shall make, Art III, s2.
A sense of the House resolution is a spineless copout, and I wouldn't spend a dime or five minutes of my time promoting it.
Congress should not "express its sense", Congress should FORBID, by statute in the form of an Article III regulation, ANY use of ANY foreign court or parliamentary opinion in any adjudication before ANY US Court.
Nothing less will suffice.
To: totherightofu
Best House bill I have seen in a while!!!
Do you think Ron Widen (D OR) will go for it? OR Wu (D OR)? I am not holding my breath but I WILL be calling them!
36 posted on
03/03/2005 7:12:37 AM PST by
Danae
(Supporting PETA - People for Eating Tasty Animals)
To: totherightofu
"Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence, (I conjure you to believe me fellow citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake; since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of Republican Government." --George Washington
40 posted on
03/03/2005 7:16:16 AM PST by
NY.SS-Bar9
(DR #1692)
To: totherightofu
It's about time. If we can get this passed, it may hold us over till we have enough to impeach the lawless ones off the court.
42 posted on
03/03/2005 7:18:12 AM PST by
D Rider
To: totherightofu
Sense of the House (or Senate) resolutions are generally written and passed so they can avoid ding anything real, with teeth.
This is an empty pap for the masses.
48 posted on
03/03/2005 7:31:42 AM PST by
savedbygrace
("No Monday morning quarterback has never led a team to victory" GW Bush)
To: totherightofu
Congress has the power under the Constitution to limit the jurisdiction of the Federal Courts. It's there in black and white and plain English. It's time for Congress to stop passing resolutions and start passing limitations.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson