Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

STOP THE ROGUE SUPREME COURT! SUPPORT HR 97!!
http://thomas.loc.gov/ ^

Posted on 03/03/2005 6:23:35 AM PST by totherightofu

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 last
To: sagebrush58

I agree. The idea of judicial review is the root of the problem-not a matter of the ideology of who's doing it-- that's like saying the Soviet Union failed because the wrong people were in charge.

Judges as a nature in this country, don't seek to right wrongs or be meter out justice, they seek to re-write law. If they have a problem with a law they should, as in the case of many a state court (that is not run rampant like the feds or other states) and simply say, go back and review this, re-write it etc, it does not work, rather than take it upon themselves to rewrite the law....

as for O'Hair (not sure if i recall the opposing side), it was heard with an identical companion case, Abbington vs. Schemp. Lemon vs. Kurtzman was a more recent decision and Lemon actually was more positive step than negative in terms of religious liberty in America (so that claim about Lemon is errant)--if it has a secular purpose, and is not exclusively intended to promote religion, then it is ok (too bad many courts ignore that because that is a perfect legal test for the 10 Commandments controversy)


141 posted on 03/08/2005 9:35:57 AM PST by Schwaeky (Protect democracy in America--kill ALL: lawyers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
Constitution ping.
142 posted on 03/08/2005 9:37:49 AM PST by biblewonk (Neither was the man created for woman but the woman for the man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

Yeah and don't back down like the Frankfurter court did under FDR, and kow-tow under the threat of the court packing to go along with the New deal agenda, the senate should ram rod it through, one way, or another.....


143 posted on 03/08/2005 9:47:59 AM PST by Schwaeky (Protect democracy in America--kill ALL: lawyers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk

Ehhhh, why bother? The SCOTUS will just declare this bill un-Constitutional (and will likely cite some foreign cases).

;O)


144 posted on 03/08/2005 10:16:21 AM PST by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: totherightofu

I wonder whether our brain-dead Supremes have realized that with their ludicrous decision citing foreign law, they have enabled Muslim savages to argue now that US courts should take sharia law into account, as well. After all, we're certainly not Eurocentric, are we? I'm waiting for a Muslim savage accused of an honor killing, or assaulting a Westerner, to produce the relevant verses of the Koran, complete with exegesis by Muslim scholars, indicating that the defendant's behavior was sanctioned by sharia, and to argue that since the courts take European law and opinion into account, they should accord Muslim law and custom the same respect.


145 posted on 03/09/2005 8:46:40 AM PST by white trash redneck (Everything I needed to know about Islam I learned on 9-11-01.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson