Your point is well taken, but it is a matter of degree. We are well past merely momentarily unpopular decisions. What we have instead is a court which is essentially lawless, and which recognizes no restraint on its own power. They truly believe, and manifest in their actions, that they can do anything they want. Like the Red Queen, words have no meaning but those that they assign. In particular, they are entirely unconstrained by the text or history of the constitution, by any previous interpretative norms, by their oath of office, by their own precedents, by logic, facts, or anything other than the requirement to get 5 votes. They are like a bunch of teenagers in an incoherent fog of bong hits issuing pronunciamentos on such vaporous nonsense as how to realize the inherent human potential for dignity and personhood, as understood by evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society which emanate from inscrutable penumbras. The court-approved methods for doing so are cornholing, abortion, virtual child pornograpy, and nekkid dancing. Court-forbidden methods include prayer in school and many methods of criticizing candidates for federal office. It is a fact that virtual child pornography enjoys greater first amendment protection under this court's decisions than does core political speech about a candidate's qualifications for office.
But there are and must be limits on the power of the court in the text of the constitution, in the plain meaning of words, in the truth of facts and logic. The branches of government were intended to contend for power, and it is high time that the other two branches respond to the outrageous, lawless and unconstitutional conduct of this court.
We need you legal eagles to explain this alledged "impossibility to impeach" Supreme Court judges.
Given the fact that there are major institutions within the society which aid and abet these decisions mustering an effective opposition is particularly daunting.
First we have the RATS in Congress able to cripple reform through the extra-Constitutional means of the filabuster.
The we have the lyin' RATmedia which obscures even the most egregious atrocities and heaps morality under a mountain of scorn and ridicule. Both work closely with an educational establishment that is devoted to perversity and anti-Americanism as exemplified by Churchill.
The Courts are not even close to being our biggest problem.