Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justshutupandtakeit

I believe completely ignoring the basic denotative meaning of the plain language of the Constitution falls outside of the acceptable "degree" of judicial activism.

I believe this latest ruling falls under the above description.

Congress can, and should, snap these usurpers' garters.
They won't, but they can and should.


50 posted on 03/03/2005 6:29:56 AM PST by King Prout (Remember John Adam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: King Prout

Tofu has started a new thread rather than respond in this one:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1355004/posts


51 posted on 03/03/2005 6:31:01 AM PST by Darksheare (Tagline error. Expected file 'zot.class' not present. Contact site Admin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: King Prout

Constitutional grounds for impeachment do not include poor decisions or unpopular decisions but not continuing "good behavior" rather than my prior statement of "high crimes and misdemeanors" This wording was chosen for specific reasons.


90 posted on 03/03/2005 7:20:16 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson