Let me see if I get this right, you place great significance on the legally vague concepts "cruel" and "unusual" but feel free to ignore the plain meaning of the term "good behavior" and replace it with "issuing rulings I don't like." OoooK. Carry on.
lordy, you sure love to dance.
first you say I believe cruel and unusual are too specific, then you say the meanings I derive from the Founders is too vague.
Then you mischaracterize my beef with the SCOTUS as a belief that "rulings I do not like" constitutes a breach of "good behaviour", while utterly failing to address the multiple iterations of explanations of how the SCOTUS is usurping power and exercising authority in a clearly unconstitutional and extraconstitutional manner.
you MUST be a lawyer.