Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: montag813

You would have to hold your nose to vote for one of the most consevative, pro-life members of the Senate? Why?


9 posted on 03/02/2005 10:34:50 PM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: zbigreddogz

Gee, Santorum hacked Pat Toomey to endorse Arlen "Scottish Law" Specter and continue his reign of terror on the Judiciary committee. I can't imagine why montag would feel that way. /sarcasm

Casey will get the nod, Santorum will lose in the general because conservatives will stay home, and PA will be stuck with two libs in the Senate. Thanks a lot, Rove.


10 posted on 03/02/2005 11:39:06 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (The South will rise again? Hell, we ever get states' rights firmly back in place, the CSA has risen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: zbigreddogz
You would have to hold your nose to vote for one of the most consevative, pro-life members of the Senate? Why?

Because he threw those credentials in the trash by backing Specter over toomey. Specter feels abortion is akin to removing an unwanted wart. Toomey values innocent human life. Toomey would have won. It was an unacceptable (and unneccesary) betrayal.

17 posted on 03/03/2005 2:17:09 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson