Well then maybe _I_ need to reread the document. But I don't see that the Executive can act as an appellate Court to the Supreme Court. As I understand it, the ONLY avenue then open is to literally amend the Constitution. Thus people talked of pro-life Amendments. People talked last year of a defense of marriage Amendment.
It's difficult to cast this sort of thing into law. To some extent, the Court has always been a bit of a challenge to the functioning of the Republic. Some never did like the idea of 'judicial review'. Many on FR still call for the abandonment of this which is one of the first 'benefits' often cited by lib professors in undergrad Constitutional Law courses. How does one properly check and balance the Judiciary? How would such an Amendment read? That no Constitutional dispute can be resolved by resort to foreign law and practice? Common law goes back to foreign law and practice. I'm sure some more conservative lawyers have suggested an appropriate amendment in this or that journal. I just don't know what it would be.
Thank you sir!