Agreed. I think getting to 60 in the Senate would help move things along.
The beauty of a lagging indicator is that if we can get a respect for the Constitution back into the Supreme Court, it could last a generation or two....
Agreed. I think getting to 60 in the Senate would help move things along.
The beauty of a lagging indicator is that if we can get a respect for the Constitution back into the Supreme Court, it could last a generation or two....
Not going to happen. We keep electing R's (huge switch since 1994 and Newt, both houses, bigger majority, two terms for Bush) and we keep getting: illegal influx of massive proportions, more socialism, more government, more spending, more taxes (if the cap goes off SS contributions as Bush suggested that will more than offset the "huge" tax break he gave the "rich" only it will, again, only apply to workers not the true divedend rich like Bush and Kerry-Heinz). Now with clear majorities we're told we have to get a 60 seat majority.. then once we get that it will be something else.
Most Republicans are pretty happy with the status-quo on things like abortion and immigration and real conservatives get less than liberals even though we are theoretically in the majority. Gay marraige? Gonna happen. You watch!
Unfortunately, that means we still have about twelve more to go. ;)