These numbers (along with all the others) are a little puzzling. Are they saying that all these same-sex abusers were identified as homosexual before the children were placed with them? And what about the 31% of women abusers who sexually abused boys ... ordinary pedophiles, or male-hating lesbians? And the 86% of male abusers who abused girls?
It sounds to me like the agencies need to completely revamp their screening and monitoring procedures. Homosexuality is only a little piece of the problem.
I don't know the specific answer to this; however, would suggest the sexual act itself defines a homosexual -an active homosexual is actively engaging in homosexual activities.
In my opinion, homosexuality is defined by the 'same-sex' activity and I find it odd that homosexual activists suggest that those that sexually abuse or rape children of the same sex are not 'true' homosexuals? The term bisexual or child abuser is used in many cases to deflect the obvious homosexual reality.
In my opinion -even if one is just a recreational homosexual they suffer from the homosexual disorder...