Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: crushkerry

"Yet at least from the time of the Court’s decision in Trop, the Court has referred to the laws of other countries and to international authorities as instructive for its interpretation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of “cruel and unusual punishments.”"

What year is the Trop case that he is referring to? Anyone know? What was the precedent set?


64 posted on 03/01/2005 10:40:51 AM PST by Shazolene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Shazolene
What year is the Trop case that he is referring to? Anyone know? What was the precedent set?

In 1958, the Supreme Court had decided in 
Trop v. Dulles (356 U.S. 86), that the Eighth Amendment contained an "evolving standard of decency that marked the progress of a maturing society." Although Trop was not a death penalty case, abolitionists applied the Court's logic to executions and maintained that the United States had, in fact, progressed to a point that its "standard of decency" should no longer tolerate the death penalty.

74 posted on 03/01/2005 11:09:51 AM PST by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson