My only problem with this is that someone who doesn't know the facts of the case may read a thread and see the misinformation unanswered. You never know who's reading info.
That is true, and I don't want to offend anyone that might join up to help Terri, but the disrupters follow the same format in posting.
There is a ton of information already available, and easy to find.
What I avoid is responding to posts that state information on a particular point that is easily disputed by simple reading.
For example jbane's posts are argumentative, and that person knows this.
The more time spent on arguing specific points (and that is what is amounts to), the less time one devotes to the actual cause.
This is why I would say that they are people signing up to divert our attentions from taking action to help Terri. 20 mintues tying a response that is ignored is 20 minutes that could have been spent typing a letter/message to help save Terri.