Skip to comments.
Rolling Back the Tide of Tyranny
Townhall.com ^
| 02/28/2005
| Mike S. Adams
Posted on 02/28/2005 4:00:24 PM PST by bourbon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
1
posted on
02/28/2005 4:00:26 PM PST
by
bourbon
To: bourbon
To: bourbon
Any public university with a speech code should be denied any federal funding (student loans/grants, research grants, etc.).
3
posted on
02/28/2005 4:06:40 PM PST
by
rottndog
(WOOF!)
To: Southack; Tuscaloosa Goldfinch; petitfour; Captain Kirk; Austin Willard Wright; ...
4
posted on
02/28/2005 4:07:30 PM PST
by
bourbon
(You see me here, and yet I am already changed, already elsewhere.)
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: rottndog
Wrong this attitude just makes SMUCKS like CO's Churchile smile. The brainwashing has taken effect.
6
posted on
02/28/2005 4:28:51 PM PST
by
snowman1
To: snowman1
7
posted on
02/28/2005 4:32:35 PM PST
by
rottndog
(WOOF!)
To: rottndog
If the University of Colorado had a rule about the type of people and their speaking garbage like Churchile has done in the past they could dump his sorry ass.
8
posted on
02/28/2005 4:36:55 PM PST
by
snowman1
To: snowman1
Churchill is a professor. He's paid to teach an approved curriculum, not use his classroom to push a political agenda. There are plenty of grounds to fire him, irrespective of what he said.
Speech codes have one goal--to discourage the free exchange of certain ideas. This is diametrically opposed to the original purpose of higher education.
9
posted on
02/28/2005 4:45:34 PM PST
by
rottndog
(WOOF!)
To: bourbon
"Last semester, the faculty senate at the University of Alabama (UA) passed an Orwellian speech code designed to restrict “any behavior that demeans or reduces an individual based on group affiliation or personal traits, or which promotes hate or discrimination.” 
Actually, I'm pretty certain that was an email hoax, not an actual resolution.
10
posted on
02/28/2005 5:00:16 PM PST
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
I'm tempted to look it up on the Faculty Senate's webpage, but I'm just too lazy to click and click some more. I did find the faculty senate webpage, but that's as far as I am willing to go. Makes me feel dirty just looking at it. :)
To: Southack
To: petitfour
The webpage is not up to date.
To: Austin Willard Wright
14
posted on
03/01/2005 6:34:37 AM PST
by
bourbon
(You see me here, and yet I am already changed, already elsewhere.)
To: Southack
To: petitfour
At your service, the Faculty Senate webpage and minutes showing this resolution is
here. Please bump.
To: bourbon
To: Austin Willard Wright
"No, it was not an email hoax. The Faculty Senate actually did that. Hard to believe, isn't it? See here. Now, that I have proven that it is real, I'd appreciate any bumps."
Here's a bump for showing that a proposed resolution made it into a faculty meeting.
How'd they vote on that proposal, by the way?
18
posted on
03/01/2005 12:17:04 PM PST
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
It passed without a dissenting vote though a few senators absentions. If you want see the full background, including the original press coverage, see
here.
To: petitfour
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson