I don't understand how they came to the conclusion that Terri would not want to live as she is. If she didn't take the initiative to choose death in a will, how can anyone presume to know what she wants? Apparently, Michael is claiming Terri wouldn't have wanted to live in an assisted state. Well, it sure must not have been that important to her if she never left it in writing. I also don't understand why Terri's parents weren't given custody when it was learned Michael was shacking up with a bimbo.
Whatdya wanna try to be sensible for? I also don't understand why Terri's parents weren't given custody when it was learned Michael was shacking up with a bimbo.
They filed a challenge to Michael's guardianship in 2002. Greer refuses to schedule it.
There is a coverup of previous DCF investigation.. Go to www.theempirejournal.com
This is the most recent article http://www.theempirejournal.com/030105091_schiavo_judge_greer_su.htm
Too much dirt in the articles there from the past week to be swept under the rug any longer. Please go read some of them. FYI we can only post the links and title on FR.