[dfrussell]

Activist Judge Greer has subverted the law by rejecting mountains of evidence and medical information that would have saved Terri from husband Michael and attorney George Felos' suspicious quest to have her murdered. Under Greer's liberal judicial rulings, Terri has been denied her Constitutional right to life and lawful due process.[6]

Nonesense.

The case has been to the USSC. You may not like the decision, but the Judge is doing his job and following the law.

[supercat]

The case has been to the USSC. You may not like the decision, but the Judge is doing his job and following the law.

Under rules of judicial procedure, a judge's findings that particular witnesses and pieces of evidence are credible or not credible are not subject to appellate review.

Judge Greer's rulings may be almost reasonable if all the evidence he regarded as 'credible' was actually true and all the evidence he regarded as 'not credible' was actually false, but that doesn't mean they're right. Any reasonable person would be able to see that Greer has accepted evidence that should not be considered nearly as credible as some of the evidence he has rejected. Unfortunately, the appeals process offers no protection against such things.

[EternalVigilance]

...but the Judge is doing his job and following the law.

That was what the Nazi prison guards and SS officers said, once upon a time.

But in any case, the Judge is not following the law. Read the Declaration of Independence, the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution in the Bill of Rights, and the Florida constitution. All of those documents, the documents that are the basis of all of our laws in this country, spell out the unalienable right to life clearly and unequivically.