That is not what people meant. I think it was said in error.
As far as I know the state with the fastest divorce is Nevada...3 weeks.
Anyone know different?
What I think others on the board is saying is that there would be no problem getting a divorce of the basis of adultery, no "proof" to sift through.
Now, the adultery is a conflict of interest as her guardian and that is grounds for AUTOMATIC REMOVAL of the guardian.
I still say you live with your head in the sand. You don't see it, so it must not be true. You are no where NEAR being informed about this.
You are posting against veterans of this cause who have examined just about all there is on this case.
I'm not posting "against" anyone. I think the guy's claims are suspicious. But he might be telling the truth. And we have a thread full of "veterans" - typical of threads on this topic - who lambaste the judge for refusing to do things he has NO legal authority to do, like granting a divorce because her parents, who don't have the legal right to do so, asked for it. We also have people hear advocating perjury.
I suspect that most of you "veterans" wouldn't accept Michael's approach even if Terri had said exactly what he claims.