Wrong, wrong, wrong.
There are plenty of states that grant divorces on the basis of adultery.
Not all states have adopted the "no fault" statutes.
Alsok you don't seem to be able to read the posts, or are deliberately ignoring (for meaningless arguing), to see that all of us in support of Terri are seeking a judge who will READ the petitions/briefs brought before it.
It is the right of every citizen to bring a court petition and the RIGHT to have that petition heard in full.
Greer rejects them without examining one shred of documentation. He has been doing it all along and he and the rest of the death-camp Nazi's say "that matter was already before the court, blah blah blah", knowing full well it wasn't even HEARD. When the appeals work there way up the chain, no one will hear is saying its already been heard. This is one of the biggest crocks of this whole mess!!
You live with your head in the sand.
Can you read? The assertion was that a divorce for adultery would be "automatic" - and that just ain't the case.
Playing the Nazi card, are we? That pretty much says all that needs to be said.
However, even if there were grounds, show me a state that ever allowed divorce by proxy.
To clarify my last. All 50 states allow no fault divorce. 35 of those state are no fault only. The remaining 15 have no fault as an option.