Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FR_addict; ruoflaw

I think I know the technical answer. Gibbs is representing the parents of Terri, not Terri. It is a charade for Greer to even pretend to let him make motions and participate to any degree, because Greer has made it plain that he does not recognize any standing in the case other than himself, Felos and Michael. He is "allowing" Gibbs to participate, up to a point. But when they held a conference of the parties, Greer excluded Gibbs because he considers him not a party to the case. Technically, he is correct, but only because he has ruled that the Schindlers are not parties.


4,767 posted on 03/11/2005 6:15:22 AM PST by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4761 | View Replies ]


To: txrangerette

If Judge Greer was truly a Judge he would have removed Michael Schiavo as the Guardian of Terri and stated he is NOT a party.

The Legislative Branch has the power to Impeach Judge Greer.

Those who are residents of the State of Florida should call them and tell them to do so.


4,771 posted on 03/11/2005 6:36:09 AM PST by Pepper777 (HINO - Why won't you LET the MEDIA SEE Terri?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4767 | View Replies ]

To: txrangerette
Technically, he is correct, but only because he has ruled that the Schindlers are not parties.

I thought that the ruling was that the Schindlers were not parties to the Terri's Law case only. Otherwise, I thought they were parties to "the case," "the case" being Schiavo v. Schindler.

5,239 posted on 03/11/2005 11:06:11 PM PST by Lauren BaRecall (Let me go indulge myself with a bit of chocolate Haagen-Dazs Life Support.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4767 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson