Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah

If you can't understand the import of the paragraph, it demonstrates you don't understand science. The meaning of the Darwin's reasoning is clear.

Nice try at obfuscation. Do creationists have any shame?


39 posted on 03/01/2005 3:59:49 AM PST by shubi (Peace through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: shubi
Not being a creationist I can't speak for them. On the other hand, it's very easy to acknowledge that Darwin didn't know about DNA, and until recently most of the folks in the world, if they thought about it at all, probably believed dogs and wolves were DIFFERENT species.

DNA exists. Our genome has some that clearly came from our ancesters, all the way back, and some that was acquired from different branches of life via infection, or even other, but unknown processes.

Then there's the dog/wolf problem. A dog is a wolf, but all the "natural selection" has been supplanted with "human selection".

Like I said, it's time for you guys to give up on using "intelligent design", also known as "human selection" to explain "natural selection". Certainly there's some other group of species out there where such explanation is possible ~ maybe some kind of bugs! Should be trivial, eh?!

40 posted on 03/01/2005 7:01:02 AM PST by muawiyah ( (no /sarcasm tag this time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson