I'm a pro-lifer who doesn't mind voting for pro-choice folks if they argree with me more then their opponent, especially if one holds some pro-life positions and their opponent holds none, but saying that pro-lifers should be fine with this position is abosolutely absured.
No, its more then that, its intellectually dishonest and downright condencending to the basic pro-life belief, that being that life begins at conception and that it is the duty of the Government to protect the life of a 3 month old just as much as a 30 year old. If you don't agree, fine, I can live with that and agree to disagree, but it is just so absured to say that we should just be fine with the position you listed is insulting.
Frankly, because of crap like that, and the general laughably naive foreign policy of the L's since 9/11, that I would rather vote for Barbra Boxer then a L. At least they won't claim to be my friend while they stab me in the back.
Losertarians always talk tough about how they'll show the Republicans in the next election by taking away votes from them (and they really, really mean it this time!) But real Republicans will stay with the party they know has a realistic shot at winning the White House. Maybe we should legalize drugs, but just for the losertarians-then they can get stoned to the gills if they want and they'll stop bitching and whining and leave the rest of us alone.