[GSlob]

"Prince Charles: "I don't see any reason why I should define my private life "
If there is no reason why he should define his private life, then someone else would be doing it for/to him, since nature abhors vacuum. Isn't a "not" after "should" missing there?

[F16Fighter]

"If there is no reason why he [Charles] should define his private life, then someone else would be doing it for/to him, since nature abhors vacuum. Isn't a 'not' after 'should' missing there?"

Charles wants to have his cake and eat it too while demanding no one take notice.

Nevermind he didn't seem to mind his wedding to Princess Di was the most watched spectacle in human history.