[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

Not a fair report. As far as I have read, he absolutely did not "disown" her. She no longer gets to live at home, nor he will not pay for her college. He knew about this well before she had to leave the house -- by the daughters own admission -- and he did try to persuade her to leave this lifestyle. Really, hearing only the daughters side of this is no way to draw a fair conclusion. Who knows what the other details of their conflict are, and frankly I think it is a loving thing to reject her immoral behavior, at least verbally. The truth is never unloving.

Anyway, if the topic is off limits in the case of Mary Cheney then it should be off limits in this case too.

[Joe.E.Sixpack]

and frankly I think it is a loving thing to reject her immoral behavior, at least verbally. The truth is never unloving.

It is to touchy feely postmodernist religionists who want feel goodism type religion rather than following the Biblical standards.

By cutting his daughter off, Keyes is giving her what she wants, which is to live by her own dictates, but not at his expense. Her actions are followed by consequences. She is now finding that out.

[yer gonna put yer eye out]

I agree...something like this doesn't just pop up one day and surprise the people involved...
I'm sure Mr. and Mrs. Keyes had more than a few tearful discussions with their daughter.

It's typical for some people to always take the part of the perceived, rejected offspring , and to pretend that parents automatically lose their feelings, emotions, and personal values when their children are born...That's nonsense.

As Mr. Keyes has stated very accurately, his daughter is an adult, and responsible for her own actions.

To continue to support her would violate the Keyes' beliefs...They're walking the talk...
A lot of people just talk the talk...give them credit.