[NorCalRepub]

good lord man....my diagnosis confirmed.......go look at my post #32 which you first wrote me.....the guy I wrote back knew what I was talking about......in that post I wrote that any AWB would be frivolous.......did you read that?.. of course not cause you focused in on one semantic difference and kept drilling into that....."badg·er ( ..tr.v., -ered, -er·ing, -ers. To harass or pester persistently.".....yes I think you are doing it....where in my original post did I say I wanted to infringe on something....again, anyone can pick apart semantics. To me it is analagous to driving 100 mph. Who decides the speed limit?...well I have to leave it to the govt....and of course some rights are limited. We have the right to kill in defense generally don't we. In you logic you are saying there should be no exceptions but there are exceptions to most things in life....why can't children buy liqour if their parents say it is OK?..We all know the answers to these questions but for some reason you want some detailed and specific answer....well that is the best you are gonna get.

[William Tell]

NorCalRepub said: "...and of course some rights are limited."

Is there no way that our Founders could have written a Second Amendment that would protect me from your infringing my right to keep and bear a full-auto firearm? Besides "shall not be infringed", what should they have written?

If I support amending the Constitution now to restore my rights, how should it be worded? Must I list all barrel lengths protected? Must I list every caliber protected? Must I specifically list all firing modes and firing rates that are allowed?

Is there any way to word a Second Amendment that protects my rights from infringement by a simple majority vote of Congress?