Let's see ... "hunting" ... "plinking" ... "target" ... "silhouette" ...
Nope. None of those terms shows up in the Second Amendment. AR-15s make excellent firearms for all but hunting anything but small game. The reason that the Kalifornia "Assault Weapons Ban" is so complicated is because the term "assault weapon" was invented in an attempt to outlaw some firearms. Your context clearly distinguished between what was being outlawed and "regular" firearms. It's liberal nonsense. The proof is that every time we turn around, the anti-gunners are adding something else to the list. They have no intention of ever stopping.
My M1A would make an excellent "sniper" weapon.
My Kimber Ultra-Carry is obviously designed to be "hidden" and should be highly regulated.
My Glock 26 is made of plastic and can be easily sneaked aboard aircraft since it doesn't show up on x-rays.
My 357 Magnum was purposely designed to kill people and so there is no justification for civilian ownership of such a powerful weapon. Most women can't even comfortably shoot such a powerful handgun.
My Beretta Model 92 has a loaded cylinder indicator which is obviously inadequate since a teenager here claims to have accidently shot his friend thinking the gun was not loaded.
The anti-gunners are busy pushing legislation to make every one of these firearms something other than "regular". You help them when you support outlawing my AR15.