Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sitetest
It seems to me that whatever support there was for taking decisive action will be at least somewhat dissipated by 2008.
Am I missing something, here?

sitetest, yes, there is something not stated here. First off, there is this posting: Church remains at risk of schism on homosexuality, warns Williams.

But in response to your question I will post another article illustrating how ECUSA & New Westminster are not going to amend their ways one bit. The final showdown has been postponed for now, but it be all the stronger for it.

33 posted on 02/26/2005 7:47:24 AM PST by sionnsar († trad-anglican.faithweb.com † || Iran Azadi ||)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: sionnsar

Dear sionnsar,

Yes, I saw that other thread. Thanks for the ping, as always.

I agree with you that the pagans aren't going to change. Grizzie has stated as much.

I just think that on the issue of acceptance and normalization of homosexual relations within ECUSA (and really, the Anglican Communion as a whole), this is a setback.

The final showdown, now having been postponed for three years, gives the pagans three years to establish more "facts on the ground." In addition, they can now use the actions of the orthodox Primates against them: "You didn't throw us out in 2005. In fact, you said we could stay three more years! You lived with our 'outrage' for years! You already have a history of accepting what we do! You even agreed not to meddle in our affairs while we do it!!"

Perhaps righteous anger may increase over three years' time, but I suspect that Archbishop Akinola just didn't have the votes for immediate action, and I suspect waverers today will be cool to the idea of cutting off ECUSA and the Canadians in three years.

In the meanwhile, orthodox Episcopalians must suffer for at least three more years under the yoke of the apostasy of their ecclesial masters, whose undisputed authority within the provinces of North America is recognized by the entire Anglican Communion.


sitetest


36 posted on 02/26/2005 7:59:54 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: sionnsar

Regarding your post "Church Remains At Risk of Schism":
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1351578/posts


Nothing personal--that is not your false premise, but we all MUST learn to recognize FALSE PREMISES--in this case, that the schism "could be avoided." The fact is that the infiltration and position has CAUSED the schism, whether naive do-gooders and Religious Useful Idiots acknowledge it or not. The enemy within is not "US" it is "THEM" and the fight against evil must always draw a line instead of seeking a "middle ground"

Dennis Prager has said well, "I prefer clarity to argreement."


52 posted on 02/26/2005 11:28:22 AM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (ATTN. MARXIST RED MSM: I RESENT your "RED STATE" switcheroo using our ELECTORAL MAP as PROPAGANDA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson