I make a statement which you cannot dispute and you go off on a tangent. Perhaps you should think harder.
I disagree. The statement you made was:
She is being kept from a natural death by man's unnatural life support.
I can and do dispute that on multiple levels. I dispute that starvation/dehydration is a "natural death". I dispute that food/water are "unnatural life support". In fact I think the entire statement is idiotic.
Was that not clear?
I still say we deprive you of food and water...how bout it, Turkey.