Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2

I have been figuring for several years that Syria would be next. But it became evident when we withdrew our ambassador that we will go into Lebanon first. That way we get to poke Syria in the eye, but nobody can accuse us of aggression against a sovereign nation. Rather we are freeing the Lebanese people from tyrannical occupiers.

If Syria gives us any difficulties across the border, as they are doing in Iraq, then we are justified in striking back.


16 posted on 02/25/2005 11:33:48 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero
If Syria gives us any difficulties across the border, as they are doing in Iraq, then we are justified in striking back.

We are ALREADY justified in anihilating Syria. Besides, I think we should go in NOW -- BEFORE the Hezbollah and other terrorists, and those CACHES OF SOME OF SADDAM'S WMD's get moved out of the Bekaa.

42 posted on 02/25/2005 6:01:02 PM PST by FreeKeys ("The future doesn't belong to the faint-hearted. It belongs to the brave." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson