Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ZellsBells
Yeah, you're right.

The ONLY indication Terri EVER said ANYTHING implying she'd not want to live on a resuscitator is Micheal's OWN (unsubstantiated!) single comment years after her trials started.

AFTER Micheal had spent all of her therapy money on a death-writer attorney who, like Micheal, desperately wanted her dead.
18 posted on 02/25/2005 10:08:03 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Yeah, you're right.

The ONLY indication Terri EVER said ANYTHING implying she'd not want to live on a resuscitator is Michael's OWN (unsubstantiated!) single comment years after her trials started.

AFTER Michael had spent all of her therapy money on a death-writer attorney who, like Micheal, desperately wanted her dead.

_______________________________________________________

This is an interesting comment, but not quite accurate. It went down in the following way. Prior to the settlement of the malpractice suit, MS did not know what Terri wanted. He told his former lover (Cindy) that he did not know what Terri wanted.

Michael was so in love with Terri, that he had lined up a lover within months of her collapse. He told that lover Terri was dying. When the lover ended the relationship he stalked her and almost ran her off the road. Then he had at least two other relationships including the one with his present concubine, Jodi Centonanze.

Michael's love for Terri was so great, that when his mother died, he named Jodi as his mate, and not his disabled wife.

I know what conclusions that I can make on this type of information.

Anyway, not only did Michael not know what Terri wanted, the only other people who supported his new found memory 10 plus years after Terri's collapse were HIS brother and sister in law. We have no proof at all that Terri ever made these statements. The evidence of the brother and sister in law only surfaced after the "evidence" of Michael was questioned and considered to be unreliable.

What gets me, happens to be that any judge could find that Schiavo's brother and sister in law gave clear and convincing evidence about what Terri had stated.

What is equally irksome is that the Judge (Greer) in the case made an error of fact and then ruled another witness as unreliable based upon HIS error, not her error. He then dismissed an appeal based upon HIS error, saying that it was not relevant.

Terri and her parents were set up by Michael Schiavo and his lawyers. Michael wanted Terri dead so that the truth would not come out about her collapse (more than likely there was an attempted strangulation). Michael's lawyers worked a swifty on the Schindlers.


253 posted on 06/12/2005 9:38:09 PM PDT by Maggie4life (Who is pulling the strings now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson