Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Specter: Nuclear Option Would Put Senate 'in Turmoil'
CNSNews ^ | 2/25/05 | Jeff Johnson

Posted on 02/25/2005 7:08:43 AM PST by Vaquero

Specter: Nuclear Option Would Put Senate 'in Turmoil' By Jeff Johnson CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer February 25, 2005

(CNSNews.com) -- The new chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said Thursday that changing the Senate rules to overcome unprecedented filibusters against judicial nominees would create "turmoil" and "bedlam."

"If we have the nuclear option, the Senate will be in turmoil and the Judiciary Committee will be hell," Specter (R-Pa.) told reporters at a Capitol Hill press conference.

Specter said he does not know whether the Republican leadership has 51 guaranteed votes to pass the necessary rules change that would exempt judicial nominations from filibusters, and he hopes he never finds out.

"I prefer not to come to that


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: judicialnominees; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
Specter is an embarrasment to the Repulican party. He is a RINO wuss.
1 posted on 02/25/2005 7:08:43 AM PST by Vaquero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

"Specter: Nuclear Option Would Put Senate 'in Turmoil'"

Good.


2 posted on 02/25/2005 7:10:32 AM PST by Buck W. (Yesterday's Intelligentsia are today's Irrelevantsia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Which, in Specter-ese means: the Dimowits will whine. So what's new?

Lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way! (Preferably the latter.)


3 posted on 02/25/2005 7:12:15 AM PST by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

When the pubbies start disciplining men like Specter, I will begin to believe they are worthy of trust. Until then, they are second best.


4 posted on 02/25/2005 7:12:45 AM PST by WorkingClassFilth (What if they had to hold a bake sale to pay for the salaries at NPR?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

"Specter said he does not know whether the Republican leadership has 51 guaranteed votes to pass the necessary rules change that would exempt judicial nominations from filibusters, and he hopes he never finds out."

This total garbage being spewed by Spector.

There never has been a 'rule' requiring a 'supermajority' to allow an up or down vote on judical nominees.

This is something that the democrats started when they decided that the Presidents nominees would never make it out of committee.

Twisting the Constitution to fit their agenda is what they do.


5 posted on 02/25/2005 7:13:17 AM PST by Bigh4u2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
"If we have the nuclear option, the Senate will be in turmoil and the Judiciary Committee will be hell,"

He's the chair, which is what he wanted.

Life lesson: "Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it."

6 posted on 02/25/2005 7:13:30 AM PST by pubmom (Suffering from DITS (Democrat induced tourette's syndrome)since 1992.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Vaquero

The Senate is already in Turmoil.


8 posted on 02/25/2005 7:14:34 AM PST by WesternPacific
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
All TALK and little SHOW. Just DO it.

Vote on our judges before the opportunity is forever squandered.

9 posted on 02/25/2005 7:18:00 AM PST by drc43 (We have 4 years left to get it right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Senator, can I sell you a set of HUEVOS GRANDES?


10 posted on 02/25/2005 7:18:03 AM PST by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darth

he needs cahones


11 posted on 02/25/2005 7:19:03 AM PST by Vaquero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Wah. That's why they get paid the big bucks.

Now get to nukin!


12 posted on 02/25/2005 7:19:19 AM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

NUKE 'EM!


13 posted on 02/25/2005 7:19:21 AM PST by grobdriver (Let the embeds check the bodies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
what is likely to happen if the senate does not prevent the filibuster? Obviously there will be a filibuster, which means conservative judges will not be appointed who oppose abortion and gay marriage , who oppose giving illegal aliens right heretofore enjoyed only by citizens.

Now that's turmoil for the entire country for years and years to come.

Let's face it Spector is a closet democrat.
14 posted on 02/25/2005 7:22:05 AM PST by watchdog_writer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
And the down side of this is?

Sometimes standing up for one's beliefs requires getting a little messy. Just do it!

15 posted on 02/25/2005 7:23:35 AM PST by Real Cynic No More (Al-Jazeera is to the Iraqi War as CBS was to the Vietnam War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

You never know, this could be part of a good cop/bad cop strategy. But, if Specter is seriously opposing the nuclear option, I would remind ole Arlen that his balls are in the hands of the Senate leadership. He almost did not get that chairmanship and can be removed. Lets start putting the pressure on now. Anyone have Senator Frist's number?


16 posted on 02/25/2005 7:23:57 AM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
"If we have the nuclear option, the Senate will be in turmoil and the Judiciary Committee will be hell,"

If Specter wasn't such a dumbass RINO he'd see that the Senate is already in turmoil due to the "rats unconstitutional actions regarding their responsiblity to advise and consent to the President's judicial nominees. Someone needs to tell this moron that he's sworn to uphold the US Constitution, not Scotland's.

17 posted on 02/25/2005 7:27:45 AM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

No, Senator Specter, the so-called "nuclear option" would erase all of the power you now hold and that is exactly what you fear most.


18 posted on 02/25/2005 7:28:03 AM PST by zerosix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

Second what you said! These gutless wonders should never have made Scotty McSpecter the chairman in the first place. The dem-lib-socialists are going to cause trouble no matter what -- that's what they do now that they aren't in power any longer.


19 posted on 02/25/2005 7:30:43 AM PST by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

"Specter said he does not know whether the Republican leadership has 51 guaranteed votes to pass the necessary rules change..."

I think what Specter just said is, "If it comes to it, don't count on my vote."


20 posted on 02/25/2005 7:31:43 AM PST by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson