[Kretek]

My understanding is that the persons who were fired, were fired for refusing to provide urine samples for tobacco-use analysis.

The policy, however, stated that if the analysis came back positive the person would be fired.

I'm sure there's a tactical legal advantage to doing it one way or the other, providing a sample and getting fired vs. not providing a sample and getting fired...

My understanding is that Weyers is a former football coach and is somewhat of a health & fitness freak, gets offended at the sight of out of shape people, etc.

[camle]

so its' catch-22. either you give him control over your personal life by giving hims the sample, risking termination if you get a positive (or false positive?) result, or you get fired for not providing the sample.

so.. what's to prohibit him from using that sample to test for other things, like coffee or chocolate? or diabetes?