yeah,...those types,...his kind,...on another note, Arlene Hirchfelder is right across the river from us in Teaneck,...maybe there's someone with more "juice", someone she respects who'd have a lunch with her. I don't know her politics,but I can sort of guess.
"yeah,...those types,...his kind,...on another note, Arlene Hirchfelder is right across the river from us in Teaneck,...maybe there's someone with more "juice", someone she respects who'd have a lunch with her. I don't know her politics,but I can sort of guess."
She's either patronized Churchill, the phony artist and phony Indian, out of ignorance even though she is an authority on Indian culture, or she patronized Churchill because she's a kindred "spirit."
Seems there is a hell of alot of funding flowing to academia for exploiting Indian issues, and seemingly, NOT to the benefit of Indians. I always feel skeptical in anticipation of academic revisionism on Indian matters. Before the NET, the average person didn't have sources to challenge insular academia or a forum in which to express outrage.
Just think it! The President of Harvard currently is being persecuted because he proffered an hypothesis that there may be cognitive and comprehension differences between men and women. Harvard feminists, who are instructors and students who might become instructors, cannot tolerate the thought of innate gender differences.