[msnimje]

It's an original work by me, after Thomas Mails ... the fact that the purchaser was ignorant of the reality of what was perfectly publicly stated at the time the edition was printed is not my responsibility," Churchill said.

Do you believe that sH*t?

[supercat]

It's an original work by me, after Thomas Mails ... the fact that the purchaser was ignorant of the reality of what was perfectly publicly stated at the time the edition was printed is not my responsibility," Churchill said.

How hard is it to superimpose them? Is anything beyond a single linear transform necessary to make almost everything 'fit'? If the thing were merely eyeballed off the original, it might have some merit (though unless the original was in the public domain or he had permission of the original artist, that would still be a no-no). But the photos don't make me think he even did that.

[hoosiermama]

AS in all liberals it's always the other guys fault.

[Kaslin]

Do you believe that sH*t?

It is typical of a con artist, and that is what Churchill is.

Btw I think Winston Churchill is probably turning araound in his grave of someone like the "professor" sharing his last name

[ViLaLuz]

"It's an original work by me, after Thomas Mails ... the fact that the purchaser was ignorant of the reality of what was perfectly publicly stated at the time the edition was printed is not my responsibility," Churchill said."

Even if he stated he copied the other artist's illustration, HE STILL COPIED! This is out and out plagiarism.